![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Measure For Measure
Sep. 4th, 2004 12:30 amAny man who claims that he doesn't wish his penis were larger is lying: hung like a baseball bat or a double-A battery, we all know it could be bigger. We also know that despite spammed promises of pills and potions to put meat on our members, there's no way, surgical or otherwise, to go from earthworm to anaconda. There is an answer to the problem of size: the Small Penis Support Group, launched last year in New York by Robert Woodworth. He founded the group because a little on the small side himself, he was sick of dinner-party debate about why big is so much better. A few sessions with his support group is guaranteed to help restore cockiness, even if they can't change the size. What is small anyway?
In the medical world, the deal breaking size is 12.5 centimetres (yank=5 inches), when erect. Anything smaller and it's too tiny to treat.
Recommended sites: www.smalldickmagazine.com and www.measurection.com .
US Elle columnist E. Jean Carroll puts it into perspective: "If gay men spent as much time on their careers as they do thinking about their penis size, they could be running the world right now. They're obsessed with it - as obsessed with their penises as stright women ar about their weight. It's stupid. Men with small penises are usually better lovers than men with large penises because they go the extra distance."
We've all heard the phrase: it's not how big it is but what you do with it. Is this the case? Or is this just to placate the short-changed or to be politically correct or both?
In the medical world, the deal breaking size is 12.5 centimetres (yank=5 inches), when erect. Anything smaller and it's too tiny to treat.
Recommended sites: www.smalldickmagazine.com and www.measurection.com .
US Elle columnist E. Jean Carroll puts it into perspective: "If gay men spent as much time on their careers as they do thinking about their penis size, they could be running the world right now. They're obsessed with it - as obsessed with their penises as stright women ar about their weight. It's stupid. Men with small penises are usually better lovers than men with large penises because they go the extra distance."
We've all heard the phrase: it's not how big it is but what you do with it. Is this the case? Or is this just to placate the short-changed or to be politically correct or both?
